Cem Ilkel vs Sanjar Fayziev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs S. Fayziev

Cem Ilkel

TUR

0

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

579

C. Rank

899

144

Best Rank

253

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Sanjar Fayziev

UZB

0

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

579

C. Rank

899

144

Best Rank

253

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$225.5K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Ilkel 0 - 2 Fayziev

They have played 5 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 1 and Sanjar Fayziev winning 4. The last match between Sanjar Fayziev and Cem Ilkel was at the Davis Cup, Group I, PO, UZB-TUR 2-3, 04-03-2022, Round: Rubber 1, Surface: I.hard, with Sanjar Fayziev getting the victory 6-3 6-7(1) 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ilkel	0
Fayziev	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(Rubber 1) Davis Cup, Group I, PO, UZB-TUR 2-3(03-04-22)

Stats

Sanjar Fayziev

Cem Ilkel

(QF) Uzbekistan F4 (Namangan)(06-07-18)

Stats

Cem Ilkel

w/o

Sanjar Fayziev

(F) Uzbekistan F3 (Andijan)(06-02-18)

Stats

Sanjar Fayziev

Cem Ilkel

C. Ilkel vs S. Fayziev H2H Profile

C. Ilkel	Stats	S. Fayziev
$225,530	Career Prize Money	$0
56.52% (438-337)	Career Total W/L	55.83% (249-197)
0	Hard	1
0	Indoor	1
7	Titles	7
0	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Ilkel vs S. Fayziev Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 54.00% of points on their second serve, while Sanjar Fayziev has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 48.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sanjar Fayziev has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 20.00% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sanjar Fayziev has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 69.77% of matches played (W/L 30/13), with Sanjar Fayziev winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Sanjar Fayziev has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 46/35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/10), where as Sanjar Fayziev has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 0 times and Sanjar Fayziev being victorious 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 1 and Sanjar Fayziev winning 4.
The last match between Cem Ilkel and Sanjar Fayziev was at the Davis Cup, Group I, PO, UZB-TUR 2-3, 04-03-2022, Round: Rubber 1, Surface: I.hard, with Sanjar Fayziev getting the victory 6-3 6-7(1) 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:54:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 428.37 while Sanjar Fayziev has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 73% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sanjar Fayziev has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 15.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sanjar Fayziev has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cem Ilkel vs Sanjar Fayziev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Ilkel vs S. Fayziev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Ilkel	Stats	S. Fayziev
0	H2H Matches Won	2
1	Sets Won	4
24	Games Won	31
11	Aces (Total)	5
2	Total Double Faults	3
0:54:0	Average Match Time	0:54:0
58% (49/84)	1st Serve %	59% (43/73)
76% (37/49)	1st Serve Win %	79% (34/43)
49% (17/35)	2nd Serve Win %	63% (19/30)
20% (1/5)	Break Pts Won %	15% (2/13)
27% (20/73)	Return Points Win %	36% (30/84)
0% (0/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chisinau Challenger - 26-05-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
R1 Mukund SasikumarM. Sasikumar	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tbilisi Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Giles HusseyG. Hussey	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
M25 Tbilisi - 12-05-2025
R1 Evgeny KarlovskiyE. Karlovskiy	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Sharm ElSheikh - 21-04-2025
SF Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

S. Fayziev Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Astana Challenger - 24-07-2023
Q1 Alexander ZgirovskyA. Zgirovsky	L	4-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
M15 Monastir - 17-07-2023
R1 Antoine GhibaudoA. Ghibaudo	L	7-6(7) 6-4	Stats
Q2 Aleksandr LobanovA. Lobanov	W	6-7(5) 7-5 10-1	Stats
Q3 Adit SinhaA. Sinha	L	4-6 6-0 10-6	Stats
Q1 Hugo CardinaudH. Cardinaud	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Ilkel vs S. Fayziev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Ilkel	Stats	S. Fayziev
56.52% (438/337)	YTD Win/Loss	55.83% (249/197)
54.63% (979/813)	Sets Win/Loss	55.13% (564/459)
51.54% (8791/8267)	Games Win/Loss	51.62% (4936/4627)
61.41% (288/181)	Hard Win/Loss	56.64% (128/98)
44.53% (57/71)	Clay Win/Loss	55.64% (74/59)
54.76% (92/76)	Indoor Hard W/L	55.29% (47/38)
10.00% (1/9)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.34	Aces Per Game	0.36
2865	Aces Total	1677
0.17	Double Faults Per Game	0.17
1385	Total Double Faults	781
1:15:9	Average Match Time	1:15:17
560.11	Average Opponent Rank	560.55
58% (24152/41308)	1st Serve %	61% (13990/23065)
70% (16999/24152)	1st Serve Win %	70% (9734/13990)
51% (8757/17156)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (4480/9075)
40% (1622/4023)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (987/2338)
39% (16247/41803)	Return Points Win %	40% (9346/23221)
31.82% (7/15)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
66.67% (2/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
31.82% (7/15)	Cups W/L	13.33% (2/13)
17.86% (5/23)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
52.23% (176/161)	Challenger W/L	38.14% (45/73)
66.39% (241/122)	Futures W/L	64.74% (202/110)
56% (426/756)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (244/428)
40% (4/10)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	30% (3/10)
53% (147/275)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (64/123)
56% (130/233)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (64/127)
85% (424/362)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (247/207)
14% (424/60)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (247/39)
21% (350/74)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (199/41)